https://jem-online.org/index.php/jem/issue/feed Journal of Ecosystems and Management 2026-01-27T11:16:22+00:00 Marilyn Bittman managing_editor@jem-online.org Open Journal Systems <p>The <em>Journal of Ecosystems and Management </em>(JEM) is a peer-reviewed electronic journal covering natural resource and ecosystem management issues relevant to British Columbia. In addition to scientific articles, JEM provides a forum for commentary on current natural resource challenges. JEM’s broad readership includes natural resource practitioners, professionals, policymakers, and researchers. The Journal extends research results, indigenous knowledge, management applications, socio-economic analyses, and scholarly opinions. JEM is an open-source journal, freely available to the public at <span id="OBJ_PREFIX_DWT2244_com_zimbra_url" class="Object"><span id="OBJ_PREFIX_DWT2245_com_zimbra_url" class="Object"><a href="http://www.jem-online.org" target="_blank" rel="noopener">www.jem-online.org .<br /></a></span></span></p> <p><strong>Reader Comments </strong>Your views and comments are always welcome. Please register to comment on articles.</p> https://jem-online.org/index.php/jem/article/view/639 Assessment of the Live Tree Retention Targets of the Williamson’s Sapsucker Best Management Practices 2025-12-10T21:07:10+00:00 Les Gyug Les_gyug@shaw.ca Julien St-Amand julien.st-amand@alumni.ubc.ca <p>Best Management Practices (BMPs) for timber harvesting in Endangered Williamson’s Sapsucker Critical Habitat were published in 2014. These established several live tree (&gt;17.5-cm dbh) retention targets in cutblocks (with a minimum of 85 live tree stems per ha (sph) and a maximum of over 225 sph) to maintain suitable habitat of Williamson’s Sapsucker. We first reviewed the rationale for the targets and found them well supportednby analyses of independent datasets. These datasets included locations of nests in cutblocks relative to sph, direct observations of adults foraging from nests, foraging stand preferences based on radio-telemetry, tree densities at nests versus unoccupied sites, and breeding occupancy of cutblocks. Williamson’s Sapsucker avoided stands with &lt;100 sph and &gt;400 sph. Examination of 113 cutblocks approved after 2014 that contained Critical Habitat for Williamson’s Sapsucker found that 62% did not retain even the minimum 85 sph targetsnof the BMPs, largely because application had been voluntary. The live tree retention targets will need to be met by selection harvesting and silvicultural systems at the hectare scale, i.e., not averaged over whole cutblocks, because any portions of cutblocks with &lt;100 sph would be lost habitat that could not be replaced by averaging over portions of the block that may be more densely treed.</p> 2026-01-27T00:00:00+00:00 Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of Ecosystems and Management